PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.56%
Revenue decline while PAAS shows 26.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.24%
Cost reduction while PAAS shows 0.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.22%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PAAS's 63.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.95%
Margin expansion below 50% of PAAS's 29.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.51%
Other expenses growth less than half of PAAS's 74.41%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
53.37%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.92%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
3.69%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.86%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-99.80%
Interest expense reduction while PAAS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.18%
D&A reduction while PAAS shows 19.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.37%
EBITDA decline while PAAS shows 78.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.10%
EBITDA margin decline while PAAS shows 77.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.57%
Operating income decline while PAAS shows 96.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.15%
Operating margin decline while PAAS shows 55.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
99.79%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.68%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PAAS's 68.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.45%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 32.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-129.90%
Tax expense reduction while PAAS shows 2320.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.24%
Similar net income growth to PAAS's 15.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
15.18%
Net margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 15.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of PAAS's 15.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.