95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.93%
Revenue decline while PAAS shows 25.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.84%
Cost reduction while PAAS shows 27.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.34%
Gross profit decline while PAAS shows 21.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.24%
Margin expansion while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1243.06%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-31.77%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-28.35%
Total costs reduction while PAAS shows 23.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
97.44%
Interest expense growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-32.92%
D&A reduction while PAAS shows 28.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.74%
EBITDA decline while PAAS shows 31.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.54%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PAAS's 4.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.55%
Operating income decline while PAAS shows 16.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.21%
Operating margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2074.36%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-81.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-15.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.71%
Net margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.05%
Share count increase while PAAS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.12%
Diluted share increase while PAAS reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.