95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
78.11%
Positive growth while PAAS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
153.46%
Cost increase while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
56.56%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 24.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-12.10%
Margin decline while PAAS shows 27.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.08%
G&A growth above 1.5x PAAS's 1.02%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
244.59%
Other expenses growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
84.79%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 17.67%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
144.89%
Total costs growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1333.12%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x PAAS's 163.97%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
230.63%
D&A growth above 1.5x PAAS's 2.83%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
75.24%
EBITDA growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.72%
EBITDA margin decline while PAAS shows 19.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
56.27%
Operating income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-163.83%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 199.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
54.64%
Pre-tax income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1487.52%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PAAS's 6.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
48.49%
Net income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.06%
EPS growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.06%
Diluted EPS growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.14%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 1.29%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.