PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.63%
Positive growth while PAAS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.27%
Positive growth while PAAS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.93%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 90.74%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-21.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.93%
Total costs growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.35%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
14.65%
D&A growth while PAAS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.07%
EBITDA growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.27%
Operating income growth while PAAS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-535.20%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 162.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-91.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
170.24%
Tax expense growth while PAAS reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-92.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.20%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PAAS's 1.27%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.