PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.87%
Revenue growth 50-75% of PAAS's 10.79%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-1.55%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
18.63%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PAAS's 260.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.98%
Margin expansion below 50% of PAAS's 245.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.71%
G&A growth while PAAS reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.66%
Other expenses growth less than half of PAAS's 67.12%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
99.80%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PAAS's 32.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.28%
Total costs growth while PAAS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.64%
Interest expense reduction while PAAS shows 432.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.21%
D&A growth less than half of PAAS's 7.90%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-16.76%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.03%
EBITDA margin decline while PAAS shows 135.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.88%
Operating income decline while PAAS shows 108.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.96%
Operating margin decline while PAAS shows 107.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.91%
Other expenses reduction while PAAS shows 77.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-203.03%
Tax expense reduction while PAAS shows 883.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.95%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.95%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.