95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
47.14%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.77%
Cost growth above 1.5x RGLD's 2.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
70.16%
Positive growth while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
15.65%
Margin expansion while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
221.86%
Other expenses change of 221.86% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
21.97%
Operating expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.67%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.83%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
72.99%
EBITDA growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.98%
EBITDA margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.16%
Operating income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.08%
Operating margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-38.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
77.42%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.58%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-112.65%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
96.62%
Net income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.63%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.21%
EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.88%
Diluted EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.