95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.05%
Revenue decline while RGLD shows 28.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.69%
Cost reduction while RGLD shows 37.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.94%
Gross profit decline while RGLD shows 26.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
Margin expansion while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
Other expenses change of 15.84% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
15.76%
Operating expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.08%
Total costs reduction while RGLD shows 9.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
83.18%
Interest expense change of 83.18% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
15.76%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.94%
EBITDA decline while RGLD shows 31.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.37%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to RGLD's 2.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-8.75%
Operating income decline while RGLD shows 46.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.88%
Operating margin decline while RGLD shows 14.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.08%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 430.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.00%
Pre-tax income decline while RGLD shows 65.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.46%
Pre-tax margin decline while RGLD shows 28.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-488.93%
Tax expense reduction while RGLD shows 72.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.35%
Net income decline while RGLD shows 65.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.45%
Net margin decline while RGLD shows 29.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.09%
EPS decline while RGLD shows 66.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while RGLD shows 64.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.36%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 1.63%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 1.67%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.