95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.60%
Revenue growth 50-75% of RGLD's 6.79%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
20.16%
Similar cost growth to RGLD's 25.78%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-0.21%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-188.44%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-27.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
12.09%
Similar total costs growth to RGLD's 14.62%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.32%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x RGLD's 24.37%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
3.46%
Similar EBITDA growth to RGLD's 4.21%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.18%
Operating income growth below 50% of RGLD's 5.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-395.45%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 15.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.08%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.35%
Tax expense reduction while RGLD shows 13.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.19%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 4.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.46%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.89%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 2.44%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.89%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 5.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.02%
Diluted share reduction while RGLD shows 0.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.