95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-18.89%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
38.55%
Cost increase while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-39.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.62%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.99%
Other expenses change of 34.99% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-4.54%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
32.58%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
271.32%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RGLD's 7.75%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
69.79%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.29%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.52%
EBITDA margin decline while RGLD shows 6.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-305.33%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 70.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.15%
Pre-tax income decline while RGLD shows 4.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.84%
Pre-tax margin decline while RGLD shows 35.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-61.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-46.70%
Net income decline while RGLD shows 65.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.28%
Net margin decline while RGLD shows 114.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.37%
EPS decline while RGLD shows 67.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.95%
Diluted EPS decline while RGLD shows 66.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.11%
Share count increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.16%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.