95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.29%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.13%
Cost reduction while RGLD shows 6.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.43%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
G&A reduction while RGLD shows 38.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.77%
Other expenses change of 18.77% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-0.98%
Operating expenses reduction while RGLD shows 38.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.21%
Total costs reduction while RGLD shows 12.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.53%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.27%
D&A reduction while RGLD shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.87%
EBITDA growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.81%
EBITDA margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
34.41%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.09%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.41%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
8.35%
Net income growth below 50% of RGLD's 41.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.67%
Net margin growth below 50% of RGLD's 44.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of RGLD's 37.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of RGLD's 37.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 1.26%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 1.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.