95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.61%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.81%
Cost growth less than half of RGLD's 4.24%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.39%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.28%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.35%
Other expenses change of 199.35% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-15.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.14%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.89%
Interest expense reduction while RGLD shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.43%
D&A growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.21%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
4.61%
EBITDA growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.87%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of RGLD's 1.31%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
24.31%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.25%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.62%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-885.93%
Tax expense reduction while RGLD shows 30.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
21.86%
Net income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.12%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
Diluted EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.48%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.