PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.16%
Revenue decline while RGLD shows 21.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.23%
Cost growth less than half of RGLD's 29.00%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-18.53%
Gross profit decline while RGLD shows 15.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
G&A growth less than half of RGLD's 57.60%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.81%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.76%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RGLD's 57.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.52%
Total costs growth less than half of RGLD's 32.79%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-46.66%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.16%
D&A growth less than half of RGLD's 14.17%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-14.37%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.53%
Operating income decline while RGLD shows 9.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.68%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6171.43%
Tax expense reduction while RGLD shows 8.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.18%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.18%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.07%
Share count increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.04%
Diluted share increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.