95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.63%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.02%
Cost increase while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.27%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 2.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.12%
Margin decline while RGLD shows 4.06% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
G&A reduction while RGLD shows 17.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.93%
Other expenses change of 164.93% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-21.17%
Operating expenses reduction while RGLD shows 17.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.93%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.35%
Interest expense reduction while RGLD shows 16.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
14.65%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.07%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 3.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of RGLD's 5.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
9.27%
Operating income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-535.20%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 82.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-91.87%
Pre-tax income decline while RGLD shows 7.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.72%
Pre-tax margin decline while RGLD shows 9.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
170.24%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-92.92%
Net income decline while RGLD shows 12.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.66%
Net margin decline while RGLD shows 14.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.44%
EPS decline while RGLD shows 13.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.44%
Diluted EPS decline while RGLD shows 13.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.20%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.