95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.85%
Revenue decline while RGLD shows 1.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-22.72%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-10.34%
Gross profit decline while RGLD shows 5.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.15%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 3.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
G&A growth while RGLD reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.33%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.50%
Operating expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.93%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.25%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-25.37%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
346.56%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 4.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.22%
EBITDA margin decline while RGLD shows 3.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.14%
Operating margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
97.25%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
149.05%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
159.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-148.72%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
149.47%
Net income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.22%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.39%
EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.39%
Diluted EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.