PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.83%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.78%
Cost increase while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
12.55%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.36%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 2.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
G&A growth while RGLD reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.19%
Other expenses change of 323.19% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
150.94%
Operating expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.61%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.12%
Interest expense growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.87%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.85%
EBITDA decline while RGLD shows 4.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.36%
EBITDA margin decline while RGLD shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.38%
Operating income decline while RGLD shows 24.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.32%
Operating margin decline while RGLD shows 27.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.52%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.99%
Pre-tax income decline while RGLD shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while RGLD shows 33.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1963.31%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-79.93%
Net income decline while RGLD shows 57.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.03%
Net margin decline while RGLD shows 61.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
EPS decline while RGLD shows 56.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
Diluted EPS decline while RGLD shows 56.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.