95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.68%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.85%
Positive growth while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.63%
Margin expansion while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
G&A growth while RGLD reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
736.29%
Other expenses change of 736.29% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
69.77%
Operating expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.75%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.45%
Interest expense reduction while RGLD shows 28.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.51%
D&A reduction while RGLD shows 3.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.74%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.66%
EBITDA margin decline while RGLD shows 0.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
80.52%
Other expenses growth less than half of RGLD's 232.21%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-2.25%
Pre-tax income decline while RGLD shows 3.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.44%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of RGLD's 17.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-156.85%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
11.50%
Net income growth below 50% of RGLD's 27.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of RGLD's 44.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
EPS growth 50-75% of RGLD's 27.12%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of RGLD's 27.12%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.19%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.