95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.85%
Revenue decline while RGLD shows 7.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.90%
Cost reduction while RGLD shows 6.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.30%
Gross profit decline while RGLD shows 8.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.55%
Margin decline while RGLD shows 0.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
131.63%
Other expenses change of 131.63% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-55.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.07%
Total costs reduction while RGLD shows 4.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.61%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.33%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.04%
EBITDA decline while RGLD shows 8.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.32%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.48%
Operating margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.66%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.88%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14030.23%
Tax expense reduction while RGLD shows 774.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.90%
Net income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.62%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.06%
EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.09%
Share count reduction below 50% of RGLD's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.