95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.44%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.53%
Cost increase while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.52%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.95%
G&A growth while RGLD reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
828.79%
Other expenses change of 828.79% while RGLD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
16.40%
Operating expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.27%
Total costs growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.26%
D&A growth 50-75% of RGLD's 16.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
5.99%
EBITDA growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.14%
EBITDA margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.37%
Operating income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
183.39%
Other expenses growth while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
116.08%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
108.90%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.43%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
116.27%
Net income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
109.08%
Net margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.67%
EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.67%
Diluted EPS growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.