95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.62%
Positive growth while RGLD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
135.58%
Cost increase while RGLD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.89%
Positive growth while RGLD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-18.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.26%
G&A growth above 1.5x RGLD's 24.18%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-98.02%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-85.70%
Operating expenses reduction while RGLD shows 24.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.64%
Total costs reduction while RGLD shows 1.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-93.52%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.28%
D&A growth while RGLD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
92.10%
EBITDA growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
55.39%
EBITDA margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
147.14%
Operating income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
99.91%
Operating margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.40%
Other expenses reduction while RGLD shows 452.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
136.74%
Pre-tax income growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.50%
Pre-tax margin growth while RGLD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.97%
Tax expense growth while RGLD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
188.14%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 5.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
133.07%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 10.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
194.74%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 4.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 5.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.05%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while RGLD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.