95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.97%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.71%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
10.64%
Similar gross profit growth to SAND's 13.91%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
3.43%
Margin expansion below 50% of SAND's 10.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 2.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.47%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 90.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-17.77%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 38.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.45%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.97%
Interest expense growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.59%
Similar EBITDA growth to SAND's 13.91%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
3.38%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SAND's 10.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.42%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.03%
Similar operating margin growth to SAND's 5.76%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
36.68%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 73.77%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
13.90%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 39.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 36.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.91%
Tax expense growth less than half of SAND's 20.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
15.07%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 47.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.57%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 43.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 50.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 49.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.04%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.38%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.