95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.06%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 2.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.06%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.98%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 38.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.98%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.93%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.40%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 13.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
37.36%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 10.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.98%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.92%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 5.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-15.44%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 73.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-298.84%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 39.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-298.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 36.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-210.29%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 20.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-368.18%
Net income decline while SAND shows 47.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-368.35%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 43.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-366.67%
EPS decline while SAND shows 50.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-366.67%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 49.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.