95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 2.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.12%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
9.63%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of SAND's 13.91%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
13.43%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x SAND's 10.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.13%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 90.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.06%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 38.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.25%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.06%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.51%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SAND's 13.91%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
14.25%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 10.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
17.56%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
21.64%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 5.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-52.43%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 73.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.48%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 39.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.52%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of SAND's 36.25%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
775.68%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x SAND's 20.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.89%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 47.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.71%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 43.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.00%
EPS decline while SAND shows 50.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 49.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.37%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.16%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.