PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.56%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.24%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.22%
Growth of 4.22% while SAND shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
6.95%
Margin change of 6.95% while SAND shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.51%
Other expenses change of 26.51% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
53.37%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SAND's 506.54%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.69%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 506.54%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-99.80%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.18%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.37%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.10%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.15%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
99.79%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.68%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.45%
Margin change of 8.45% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-129.90%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 14.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.24%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.18%
Margin change of 15.18% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
18.18%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.