PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.31%
Growth of 1.31% while SAND shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
-61.24%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
428.44%
Growth of 428.44% while SAND shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
421.61%
Margin change of 421.61% while SAND shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25234.62%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
147.24%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 58.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-35.87%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 58.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.24%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
450.00%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
414.53%
Margin change of 414.53% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1191.12%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1174.45%
Margin change of 1174.45% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
104.49%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
129.88%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
129.49%
Margin change of 129.49% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-225.74%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 666.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
130.31%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
129.91%
Margin change of 129.91% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
133.33%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
133.33%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.