95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.20%
Growth of 10.20% while SAND shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
45.00%
Cost growth of 45.00% while SAND maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-7.24%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.82%
Margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.31%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 39428.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-59.99%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 179.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.25%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 179.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.50%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 13.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
24.87%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.57%
Margin change of 19.57% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
46.83%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.24%
Margin change of 33.24% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-115.07%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 2553.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.02%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 1464.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.73%
Margin change of 10.73% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
130.14%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of SAND's 204.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
22.02%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 1979.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.73%
Margin change of 10.73% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
16.67%
EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 449.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 515.18%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
10.44%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 544.52%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.