PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
68.51%
Growth of 68.51% while SAND shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
75.60%
Cost growth of 75.60% while SAND maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
62.95%
Growth of 62.95% while SAND shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-3.30%
Margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 158.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
58.45%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 158.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.09%
D&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 5.26%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
85.52%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.10%
Margin change of 10.10% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
82.56%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.34%
Margin change of 8.34% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-109.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
82.05%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.04%
Margin change of 8.04% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
4.87%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
82.05%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.04%
Margin change of 8.04% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
57.14%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
83.33%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.19%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 31.06%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
5.38%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 33.54%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.