PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
29.79%
Growth of 29.79% while SAND shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
11.60%
Cost growth of 11.60% while SAND maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
45.14%
Growth of 45.14% while SAND shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
11.83%
Margin change of 11.83% while SAND shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
G&A change of 11.90% while SAND maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SAND's 118.98%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.63%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 118.98%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.80%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.69%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.94%
Margin change of 7.94% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
50.25%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.76%
Margin change of 15.76% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
135.66%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
51.37%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.63%
Margin change of 16.63% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1.23%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 102.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
51.37%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.63%
Margin change of 16.63% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
36.36%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.22%
Share count change of 9.22% while SAND is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
9.14%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.