PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.55%
Growth of 10.55% while SAND shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
-38.61%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
42.29%
Growth of 42.29% while SAND shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
28.71%
Margin change of 28.71% while SAND shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.97%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.97%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-35.51%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.29%
D&A growth less than half of SAND's 5222.13%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
30.26%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SAND's 41.41%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
29.13%
Margin change of 29.13% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
31.40%
Operating income growth 50-75% of SAND's 54.45%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
18.86%
Margin change of 18.86% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-4021.42%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 79.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 39.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2353.67%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x SAND's 232.71%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
19.33%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 39.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.94%
Margin change of 7.94% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-73.33%
EPS decline while SAND shows 42.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.23%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 42.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.16%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 4.71%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.51%
Diluted share reduction while SAND shows 4.71% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.