PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
78.11%
Positive growth while SAND shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
153.46%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
56.56%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.10%
Margin decline while SAND shows 4.89% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.08%
G&A growth less than half of SAND's 79.46%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
244.59%
Other expenses change of 244.59% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
84.79%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SAND's 170.61%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
144.89%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SAND's 10.41%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1333.12%
Interest expense growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
230.63%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
75.24%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
56.27%
Operating income growth 50-75% of SAND's 75.41%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-12.26%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 113.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-163.83%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
54.64%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of SAND's 75.41%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-13.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 113.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1487.52%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of SAND's 2542.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
48.49%
Similar net income growth to SAND's 51.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-16.63%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 84.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
47.06%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 35.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
47.06%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of SAND's 62.80%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.14%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 15.02%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.13%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.