95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.01%
Similar revenue growth to SAND's 19.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
4.62%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
42.43%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SAND's 86.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.69%
Margin expansion below 50% of SAND's 55.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.56%
G&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 1.81%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.05%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.12%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.88%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
4.85%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.46%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.19%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
378.13%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 21.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.84%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 1.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
173.43%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 109.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
162.22%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 74.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
49.15%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 279.15%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
157.44%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 128.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
148.67%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 90.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.25%
Tax expense growth less than half of SAND's 84.78%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
160.92%
Similar net income growth to SAND's 152.67%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
151.62%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 110.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
160.71%
Similar EPS growth to SAND's 200.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
160.71%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SAND's 200.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.23%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.31%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.56%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.