PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.87%
Positive growth while SAND shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.55%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
18.63%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.98%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.71%
G&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 6.42%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.66%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
99.80%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.28%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.64%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 46.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.21%
D&A growth less than half of SAND's 15.67%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-16.76%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.03%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 1.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.91%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-203.03%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 198.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.95%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.95%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 23.43%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 22.10%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.