PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.44%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 6.05%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-42.05%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 1.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
60.21%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 9.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.79%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.30%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 49.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6243.42%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
825.37%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
98.70%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.07%
Interest expense growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.81%
D&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 9.38%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-18.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
24.72%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 51.45%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-31.18%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
35.25%
Tax expense growth less than half of SAND's 171.18%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-43.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.12%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.25%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.