95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-46.29%
Negative ROE while FNV stands at 3.80%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-44.57%
Negative ROA while FNV stands at 3.58%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-17.03%
Negative ROCE while FNV is at 3.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
100.00%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x FNV's 73.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
23.41%
Operating margin below 50% of FNV's 71.30%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
63.64%
Similar net margin to FNV's 66.91%. Walter Schloss would conclude both firms have parallel cost-revenue structures.