95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-1.80%
Negative ROE while FSM stands at 2.50%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.66%
Negative ROA while FSM stands at 1.75%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-2.96%
Negative ROCE while FSM is at 4.36%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
100.00%
Gross margin above 1.5x FSM's 45.58%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
-9.45%
Negative operating margin while FSM has 36.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-5.75%
Negative net margin while FSM has 16.19%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.