PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
2.04%
Positive ROE while FSM is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
1.46%
Positive ROA while FSM shows negative. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a clear operational edge.
1.72%
ROCE below 50% of FSM's 3.63%. Michael Burry would question the viability of the firm’s strategy.
54.23%
Similar gross margin to FSM's 53.47%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
49.16%
Operating margin 1.25-1.5x FSM's 33.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate if management’s strategy yields a cost advantage.
48.11%
Positive net margin while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.