PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-5.62%
Negative ROE while SA stands at 13.52%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-3.92%
Negative ROA while SA stands at 12.20%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.08%
Positive ROCE while SA is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
12.77%
Gross margin of 12.77% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if a small advantage can be leveraged.
2.67%
Margin of 2.67% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would check if small gains can scale quickly.
-134.45%
Negative net margin while SA has 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.