95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-2.44%
Negative ROE while SAND stands at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-2.00%
Negative ROA while SAND stands at 0.40%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.79%
Negative ROCE while SAND is at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
35.42%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x SAND's 26.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-58.62%
Negative operating margin while SAND has 16.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-65.81%
Negative net margin while SAND has 11.32%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.