95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
42.60
P/E less than half of AEM's 156.47. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
48.39
P/S above 1.5x AEM's 22.11. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
2.12
Similar P/B to AEM's 2.71. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
77.72
P/FCF 50-75% of AEM's 111.93. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if capital allocation explains the gap.
76.54
P/OCF 1.25-1.5x AEM's 51.80. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better business model.
2.12
Similar fair value ratio to AEM's 2.71. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
0.59%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.16%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
1.29%
FCF yield 1.25-1.5x AEM's 0.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if higher yield reflects opportunity.