95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
18.60
P/E 50-75% of RGLD's 33.59. Mohnish Pabrai would examine if this pricing gap presents opportunity.
66.80
P/S 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 46.81. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better growth prospects.
2.23
Similar P/B to RGLD's 2.27. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
136.71
Positive FCF while RGLD shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
94.62
P/OCF 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 64.77. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better business model.
2.23
Similar fair value ratio to RGLD's 2.27. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
1.34%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.74%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
0.73%
Positive FCF while RGLD shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.