95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-17.92
Negative P/E while SAND shows 325.93. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
40.70
P/S 50-75% of SAND's 59.84. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
2.02
P/B 1.25-1.5x SAND's 1.42. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better growth prospects.
60.10
P/FCF 50-75% of SAND's 102.61. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if capital allocation explains the gap.
59.81
P/OCF 50-75% of SAND's 93.75. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
2.02
Fair value ratio 1.25-1.5x SAND's 1.42. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better prospects.
-1.39%
Negative earnings while SAND shows yield of 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
1.66%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.97%. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this premium.