PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.38
1.2–1.5 – Acceptable for many sectors. Peter Lynch might watch carefully for upcoming liabilities.
1.03
1.0–1.2 – On the edge. Philip Fisher might worry about unexpected shortfalls or partial reliance on inventory liquidation.
0.18
Below 0.4 – Weak immediate liquidity. Howard Marks would worry about meeting obligations if markets tighten.
5.10
5–10 – Solid coverage. Seth Klarman might verify if the ratio is consistent or if one-off gains boost EBIT.
0.34
Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.