1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14114.39%
Revenue growth above 20% – Exceptional top-line expansion. Warren Buffett would check if rising costs (e.g., SG&A) are still under control, ensuring profits grow alongside sales.
-38888.36%
Negative gross profit growth suggests either falling sales or rising direct costs. Benjamin Graham would consider this a fundamental warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-212.09%
Negative operating income growth means rising costs or falling revenues are eroding core profitability. Benjamin Graham would raise caution.
-439.49%
Negative net income growth shows profitability erosion. Benjamin Graham would worry about solvency and longer-term viability.
-438.03%
Negative EPS growth underscores deteriorating earnings per share. Benjamin Graham would worry about ongoing dilution or weakened profitability.
-438.03%
Negative diluted EPS growth suggests diluted shares grew or net income fell. Benjamin Graham would see this as a serious setback to shareholder value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.25%
OCF growth above 20% – Exceptional cash generation improvement. Warren Buffett might see if the net margin also rises in tandem.
52.52%
FCF growth above 20% – Very attractive to value investors. Warren Buffett would check if capital expenditures remain sensible to maintain this level.
-92.12%
A negative 10Y CAGR in revenue/share implies a decade of top-line decline per share. Benjamin Graham would be extremely cautious about long-term viability.
-93.31%
Negative 5Y CAGR implies mid-term contraction. Benjamin Graham would be very cautious unless a turnaround story is evident.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-589.49%
A negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR signals erosion in long-term cash generation. Benjamin Graham would label this as a major red flag.
-125.25%
A negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR indicates declining cash generation per share mid-term. Benjamin Graham would see this as a red flag unless explained by short-term strategic investments.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.25%
A negative 10Y net income/share CAGR reflects a decade of weakening profits. Benjamin Graham would be extremely cautious unless a turnaround is evident.
-289.32%
A negative 5Y net income/share CAGR reveals a mid-term deterioration in bottom-line earnings. Benjamin Graham would be cautious unless a credible turnaround is visible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
A negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR indicates cuts or stagnation. Benjamin Graham would see it as a warning unless the firm redirected funds to more profitable growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
820.38%
SG&A growth above 15% – Aggressive expense expansion. Philip Fisher demands a compelling ROI argument for such heavy spending.