PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-119.39%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with 6617.T at -3.03%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
11.55%
D&A growth of 11.55% while 6617.T is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-173.53%
Negative yoy working capital usage while 6617.T is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.17%
Inventory growth of 138.17% while 6617.T is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-169.15%
Negative yoy usage while 6617.T is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-68.33%
Negative yoy while 6617.T is 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-155.26%
Negative yoy CFO while 6617.T is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.13%
Purchases growth of 0.13% while 6617.T is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
1158.29%
Liquidation growth of 1158.29% while 6617.T is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
59.24%
Growth of 59.24% while 6617.T is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
65.21%
We expand invests by 65.21% while 6617.T is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
33.33%
Debt repayment growth of 33.33% while 6617.T is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.36%
Buyback growth of 80.36% while 6617.T is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.