PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.87%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 4997.T's 103.39%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
120.50%
Gross profit growth similar to 4997.T's 112.42%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
726.06%
EBIT growth of 726.06% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
1696.87%
Operating income growth under 50% of 4997.T's 8997.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3130.35%
Net income growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 1159.12%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
3130.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 1129.63%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
3130.71%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 1129.63%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
236.96%
Positive OCF growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
236.96%
Positive FCF growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-89.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-89.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-89.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-88.98%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-88.98%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-88.98%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
108.09%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 108.09% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
108.09%
Net income/share CAGR of 108.09% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
108.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 108.09% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-86.72%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 4997.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-86.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-86.72%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.48%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-11.36%
Negative asset growth while 4997.T invests at 17.04%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
42.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 6.90%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-8.48%
We’re deleveraging while 4997.T stands at 73.36%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.