1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-75.20%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-79.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-132.04%
Negative EBIT growth while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-139.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-157.87%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-157.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-157.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-207.70%
Negative OCF growth while 4997.T is at 10.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-207.70%
Negative FCF growth while 4997.T is at 14.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-88.47%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-88.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-88.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
92.22%
OCF/share CAGR of 92.22% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
92.22%
OCF/share CAGR of 92.22% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
92.22%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 92.22% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
83.81%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 83.81% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
83.81%
Net income/share CAGR of 83.81% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
83.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 83.81% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 4997.T shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
101.06%
Inventory growth of 101.06% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
6.62%
Asset growth of 6.62% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-19.38%
We have a declining book value while 4997.T shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.92%
Debt growth of 5.92% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.