PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-32.49%
Negative revenue growth while 4997.T stands at 3.68%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
43.36%
Positive gross profit growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
347.61%
EBIT growth of 347.61% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
228.08%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 72.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
140.65%
Net income growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 29.63%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
140.64%
EPS growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 29.61%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
140.64%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 29.61%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-265.94%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-265.94%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-90.11%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-90.11%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-90.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
94.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
94.46%
Positive OCF/share growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
94.46%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
101.47%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
101.47%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
101.47%
Positive short-term CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.89%
Inventory growth well above 4997.T's 29.92%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.96%
Asset growth at 50-75% of 4997.T's 3.70%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.29%
Positive BV/share change while 4997.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
8.68%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 4997.T's 32.71%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.