PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
90.78%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of 4997.T's 120.49%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
89.02%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of 4997.T's 126.63%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
204.72%
EBIT growth of 204.72% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
370.86%
Operating income growth under 50% of 4997.T's 3592.86%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
521.83%
Net income growth at 50-75% of 4997.T's 782.33%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
522.24%
EPS growth at 50-75% of 4997.T's 782.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
522.24%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of 4997.T's 782.37%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
436.73%
Positive OCF growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
436.73%
Positive FCF growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-88.96%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 9.31%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-88.96%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 9.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-88.96%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 9.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-80.93%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-80.93%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-80.93%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
106.67%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
106.67%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
106.67%
Positive short-term CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-87.23%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 4997.T stands at 3.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-87.23%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 4997.T is at 3.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-87.23%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 4997.T is at 3.67%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.20%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-9.55%
Negative asset growth while 4997.T invests at 16.45%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
31.28%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 6.34%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-20.50%
We’re deleveraging while 4997.T stands at 75.30%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.