PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-52.04%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-84.03%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-153.45%
Negative EBIT growth while 4997.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-154.62%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-190.27%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-190.28%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-190.28%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.63%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 4.95%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-77.63%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 4.95%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-77.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 4.95%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.18%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
79.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
79.18%
Positive short-term CAGR while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
53.04%
We show growth while 4997.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
12.28%
Positive asset growth while 4997.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-21.85%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
22.76%
Debt growth far above 4997.T's 16.39%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.