1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
76.97%
Positive revenue growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
295.25%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 4997.T's 2.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
115.96%
EBIT growth of 115.96% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
117.36%
Positive operating income growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
87.26%
Positive net income growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
87.27%
Positive EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
87.27%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.96%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 5.54%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-88.96%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 5.54%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-88.96%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 5.54%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.53%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 53.95% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
98.53%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 53.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
98.53%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 4997.T's 53.95%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.83%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.84%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.86%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-23.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.