1536.00 - 1565.00
1090.00 - 1784.00
46.2K / 155.6K (Avg.)
23.48 | 66.41
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
172.45%
Positive revenue growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
100.26%
Positive gross profit growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
710.40%
EBIT growth of 710.40% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
898.49%
Positive operating income growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
233.87%
Positive net income growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
233.92%
Positive EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
233.92%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 4997.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 11.21%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-90.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 11.21%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-87.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T stands at 11.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 4997.T stands at 23.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
105.34%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 4997.T's 72.73%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
105.34%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 4997.T's 72.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-79.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 4997.T is 72.73%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.04%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 4997.T is at 7.79%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.07%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-6.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
6.01%
Positive BV/share change while 4997.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-20.84%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.14%
SG&A growth of 148.14% while 4997.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.